Is Halloween Getting Annoying? Part II: Blame it on the IP

Part I: Blame it on the Socials

September 29, 2024 — So, I think Jack Skellington, ruiner of holidays, might be ruining Halloween this time.

Hear me out, because I’m having the same reaction to writing that sentence as you are to reading it.

The dude is everywhere. On almost every piece of merchandise this time of year. There’s a house not too far from me that has decorated for Halloween completely with Nightmare Before Christmas characters (which I guess means that they’re also ready for Christmas). These days, I almost see Jack and the residents of Halloween Town more times than I see regular old jack-o-lanterns and sheet ghosts.

And if it’s not Jack or Oogie or Sally, it’s the Sanderson Sisters. Or Michael Myers. Sam. Jason Voorhies. Pennywise. Depending on the angle, Spirit Halloween sometimes looks more like a 90s-era Spencer’s Gifts than a Halloween shop.

Now, I love The Nightmare Before Christmas. Both Halloween and Christmas are far better for it existing. I have original storyboards from the movie hanging on my library wall. I marvel at the existence of this movie. I have to watch it multiple times a season (both seasons). And I way dig Hocus Pocus. And 80s slasher movies. And all the modern monsters. These creatures and villains and killers are all welcome faces to me.

But sometimes I can’t get to the Halloween for all the movie merchandise. Like they are an invading army of corporate interests taking over my Halloween not to celebrate it, but to set up shop in the middle of it.

And they are corporate interests. These characters and stories are owned by a business. They are intellectual property. IP. And as a guy who also has IP he wants to sell you (Cult Following out now!), I get it. Jack’s round white head is a golden goose for Disney (or one of its eggs?). And I’m also fully aware that the abundant supply comes from the ravenous demand.

But remember that every Halloween night, the demand for candy from your kids is at peak, and if met, makes the kids sick.

Granted, I do like seeing corporations participate in the holiday. We live in a materialist, capitalist society. And if that is our backdrop, I want that backdrop painted black and orange during this time of year. Doesn’t mean it needs to be officially licensed black and orange, but that’s often fine, too. I like seeing Beetlejuice on Fanta cans, for instance. But to me, that’s different. Beetlejuice is a part of this unique 2024 season. He added to it with a new movie. For Poor Old Jack, they've found new ways to merchandise him every year since 1993. I imagine him trapped on Oogie Boogie’s slab, pieces of him hacked away by the swords of mechanical playing cards and transformed into purses and statuettes and sweaters (some of which, I must admit, I own). Or maybe it’s on Dr. Finkelstein’s medical table, huge chunks of his skinny body bitten out by bony reindeer and shat out into merch. Or, most probably, it’s on the conveyer belt from the Making Christmas scene, as they figure out the best presents to make of him before boxing him up.

Geezus there are a lot of metaphors for this idea in the movie.

Christmas has less of a problem with this issue. Nobody owns Santa Claus (although some brands have done great jobs of linking their products to him, like Coca-Cola), but a corporation owns Jack. Then again, a corporation also owns Rudolph. And the Bumble. So I’m not sure where I’m drawing the line here, except maybe that the same corporation that owns Jack owns most of our modern stories and actually impacts the orbit of our planet with the sheer mass of the output of its merchandising machine (astrophysicists often have to do what they call “adjusting for Walt” in their calculations).

Most likely, it’s probably the fact that we don’t have an overarching Halloween character like Santa (as hard as we’ve tried with Samhain) to keep other characters in check, and so that void elevates IP to the role. You know what they say, capitalism abhors a vacuum…unless they can sell it to you. Just kidding they don’t say that.

I do love horror movie characters in my Halloween. Of course, I do. But there is sometimes a bit of feeling preyed upon by corporations when it comes to the merchandise. Not me being preyed on, necessarily, but Halloween itself. Or, even for independent creators who bravely usurp the copyrighted imagery like tattooists or Etsy shops, it still feels a bit like the IP is limiting their imaginations or that, in the end, they’re just contributing to NASA scientists having to adjust for Walt.

Again, as I said in the previous part of this “Annoying” series (play on words purposeful), if the goal is a sincere pumpkin patch, we might need to beware if Jack is its scarecrow.



Part III: Blame it on the Rising Popularity